Abstract

How do the working lives of general practitioners in rural areas compare with elsewhere in Scotland? Cross-sectional analysis of the Scottish School of Primary Care Survey

Part of Special Series: WONCA World Rural Health Conference Abstracts 2022go to url

See as a full article: How do the working lives of general practitioners in rural areas compare with elsewhere in Scotland? Cross-sectional analysis of the Scottish School of Primary Care National GP Surveygo to url

AUTHORS

name here
Jonathan H Eaton-Hart
1 Medical Student *

name here
John CM Gillies
2 Honorary Professor of General Practice

name here
Stewart W Mercer
3 Professor of Primary Care and Multimorbidity

CORRESPONDENCE

*Mr Jonathan H Eaton-Hart

AFFILIATIONS

1 Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

2, 3 Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

PUBLISHED

10 January 2023 Volume 23 Issue 1

HISTORY

RECEIVED: 20 September 2022

ACCEPTED: 20 September 2022

CITATION

Eaton-Hart JH, Gillies JC, Mercer SW.  How do the working lives of general practitioners in rural areas compare with elsewhere in Scotland? Cross-sectional analysis of the Scottish School of Primary Care Survey. Rural and Remote Health 2023; 23: 8100. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8100

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONSgo to url

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence

go to urlCited by

no pdf available, use your browser's print function to create one


abstract:

Introduction: The shortage of GPs in Scotland is concerning, particularly in rural areas. There are many reasons why GPs are leaving general practice; however, satisfaction with working life is an important predictor of GP retention. The aim of this study was to compare the working lives and intentions to reduce work participation of rural GPs and GPs working elsewhere in Scotland.

Methods: Quantitative analysis of responses from a nationally representative survey of GPs in Scotland. GPs were classified as ‘non-rural’ or ‘rural’ and these groups were compared using univariate and multivariate statistical analysis on four domains of working lives (job satisfaction, job stressors and positive and negative job attributes) and four intentions to reduce work participation (reducing working hours, working abroad, leaving direct patient care and leaving medical work entirely).

Results: There were significant differences in characteristics between rural and non-rural GPs. After controlling for these differences, GP age and gender, rural GPs reported higher job satisfaction, lower job stressors, higher positive job attributes, and lower negative job attributes than GPs elsewhere. A significant interaction between gender and rurality was found for job satisfaction, indicating that it was rural female GPs who were more satisfied. Rural GPs were, however, more likely to intend to work abroad and leave medical work entirely within 5 years than other GPs.

Discussion: These findings corroborate research from around the world and have serious implications for the future care of patients in rural areas. Further research is urgently required to understand the drivers of these findings.

You might also be interested in:

2007 - How do we define 'rurality' in the teaching on medical demography?

2006 - Rurality and mental health: an Australian primary care study

2006 - Academic performance and scientific involvement of final year medical students coming from urban and rural backgrounds

This PDF has been produced for your convenience. Always refer to the live site https://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/8100 for the Version of Record.